Phil Wilson South Fork : S30V


The review consists of : Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Specifications : main

Image hosted by Photobucket.com The South Fork is ground from 0.110" thick S30V stainless steel, uniformly hardened to 60 HRC (HRC tested) with a full cryogenic quench. The overall length is 10.1 inches, with a sharpened edge of 4.6 inches on a blade which is 1.1 inches wide at maximum. The primary grind is full flat with an extreme distal taper. The edge is very thin, from 0.006-0.008" thick, and ground at 14-16 degrees per side. The blade was tested for edge retention and durability by Phil by whittling redwood, oak and making over 200 slices on half inch manilla.

Stock testing : main

With the origional edge profile and finished with a 1200 grit DMT hone, the South Fork push cut through hemp with 21.5 (5) lbs and made a slice with 9.5 (5) lbs, showing high aggression. With the edge refined by five passes per side on chromium oxide loaded leather, the cutting ability improved to 7.5 (5) and 17.5 (5) lbs respectively. With continued work on the loaded leather the performance maximized at 6.5 (5) and 12.5 (5) lbs respectively. This was after a total of 20 passes per side. At this point the edge was slipping a little on the two inch slice, however the push cutting sharpness was so high it was still sinking readily through the rope. At this point the South Fork took 90 (5) grams to cut the light baisting thread and 1.35 (5) centimeters to cut the light cotton under a 100 gram load, only 0.25 centimeters under a 200 gram load. The knife easily shaved, and caught hair above the skin, and would slice paper towel smoothly. Further work with sharpening which improved the cutting performance on hemp can be seen below.

The South Fork features to a very slim point due to the thin stock, high flat grind and full distal taper. The tip was still rigid enough to take a 50 lbs push into a phonebook and not require hand support such as on Catcherman. The South Fork sank to a depth of 284 (11) pages into a phone book with the edge with a rough finish from a silicon carbide stone. The point is too slim due to the distal taper to do a heavy stab, extreme control would be required to prevent the point from bending during the impact. With the edge highly polished the point penetration increased to 305 (20) pages.

Food : main

The South Fork worked very well as a paring knife. Though a little long, it was nice and light in hand and very comfortable through extended use. The efficient cutting geometry allowed it to cut into vegetables readily and the narrow blade efficiently turned while peeling potatos. It also deftly separated the rind from melons and cored apples with the precise point.

As a light utility knife, The South Fork would slice through potatos without moving the needle on a scale so it didn't even requiring a significant fraction of a pound to make the cuts. On carrots it matched the performance of the chisel ground utility knife from Lee Valley which sets an optimal standard for utility kitchen knives. Both knives both required minimal force of 1-3 lbs to make the slices. In general the more significant dropped blade profiles do make rapid dicing more efficient and allow rocking of the blades for fast mincing such as found on chef's knives but such profiles reduce blade versatility in general over the more utility based pattern of the South Fork. In general the performance of the South Fork compared well to many knives for such work is often many to one in favor of the South Fork due to the very slim blade and thin and acute edge.

carrot cutting
knife force rank
lbs
South Fork 1.5 10
RSK 4.5 4
Ratweiler 5.5 3
Heafner Bowie 7.5 2
turnip cutting
knife force rank
lbs
South Fork 3 10
RSK 9.5 3
Ratweiler 14 2
Heafner Bowie 16 2

The RSK and Ratweiler are both generally well respected in terms of cutting ability, for their class of knife. They are included to show just how far the South Fork is optomized in that regard. The Heafner Bowie is more of a tactical design with a heavier main profile. This tradeoff of cutting ability in general is made so as to allow the knives to be used as general utility tools and usually to allow significant prying. This force difference holds across other materials such as ropes, carboard or wood, specific to foods, it increases with the size of the vegetables. Cutting up turnips the advantage of a much more slender cross section is even more obvious.

The South Fork works well on meats, easily slicing up some pork rind. It also has enough length for larger cuts of meats, cutting steaks and trimming a salmon for stock. The very fine tip goes into the fish well and the edge has no problems making the heavier cuts through bones. The grip is highly reflective in several of the above pictures as the security was examined by coating the handle with olive oil to see if there would be problems with control, none were found.

Field : main

Carving woods, the South Fork performs well due to the high flat grind and thin and acute edge. For such work a high polish is optimal and when so sharpened the South Fork both cuts off very thin sections of soft and hard woods which are nearly paper thin and at the same time is capable of hogging off thick sections for roughing wood to shape for stakes or general carving projects. It is a very nice blade for such work being very light in hand and the narrow blade turns well so it cuts curves well.

The South Fork also readily removes the dried bark from larger pieces of wood which can be used for firestarting in many ways; shingles to keep the embers off the cold/wet ground, it can be scraped for tinder and burnt directly. Removing the bark also allows the wood to dry out much faster which is important for a long term perspective. Bark with a very high pitch content can also be used to make glue by heating it and adding ash/animal scat and is excellent for firestarting as it will burn hot for an extended period of time (like half an hour) and can dry out small wet woods.

As this isn't a prybar type knife the bark is cut and worked off rather than chopped/pried off rapidly as it would be with a larger knife like the Ratweiler. If a lot of bark has to be removed or it is really heavy a bark spud can be carved out of a small piece of wood to make the process more efficient. A bark spud is simply a sharpened piece of steel used to slide under the bark and pry it off, the tip is rounded to prevent the bark from being cut. They can also be made out of hard woods in a few minutes with a decent knife. They can be just carved to shape but it is usually more efficient to split a small piece of wood which reduces the need to hog off a massive amount of shavings.

Splitting the wood in general is a good ideal for most tool construction because not only does it save time in minimizing waste removal, it als gives multiple pieces of large stock to work with. Since the South Fork has a very slim profile and a very thin and acute edge, care needs to be taken during the batoning to avoid hitting the tip and not chisel cut through knots. Note the large knot on the bottom of the wood being split to the right, this was why the split was started at the other end. It took about 250 taps to drive the knife through the piece of birch far enough so that it could be pulled apart by hand. It is a simple matter then to carve a spud in a couple of minutes. This spud can be used very aggressively to remove thick barks. Unless it is fire hardened or very hard wood it will get dented up in use but it is a simple matter to resharpen it as necessary with the knife.

If a lot of heavy bark has to be removed from standing trees or fallen logs a different type of spud is more efficient. Using a fork in the wood from a branch, a hook shape can be made which allows the spud to be used with pull which is easier physically. The hook spud on the right was rough chopped to shape with a Ratweiler. In general heavier chopping knives or a small axe can rough wood to shape much quicker than even the most efficient carving knives can just slice off waste wood. This is a many to one advantage. The birch on the right of the spud is the piece of wood just below the wood which was used to make the bark spud. A decent chopping took will readily chop off all that waste wood in just a couple of minutes. A saw can also be used to make the process more efficient than just carving is a chopping tool isn't available. Make a series of cuts into the wood which will weaken the wood and it will crack off readily.

With the basic profile roughly shaped with the larger knife, the South Fork is used then to smooth out the profile making it much more ergonomic and thin out the two edges. It does this much more efficiently than the Ratweiler as the South Fork has a thinner blade profile and thus higher cutting ability. The benefits of the two edges on this spud is that they can also be differentially ground, similar to a double bitted axe. The bottom taper is shaped really fine which allows it to work off thinner barks such as birch which can be used for many things besides tinder and the top part is left fairly obtuse to handle removal of rough bark.

Breaking down larger woods, isn't an area in which the South Fork excells. It doesn't have the length nor the cross section to enable vigerous application of the necessary force to crack apart larger wood. Knives which do this well are much larger and thicker, blades like the Ratweiler a decent heavy machete like Barteaux, and as well of course solid axes like the Wildlife from Bruks. If this has to be done for burning or construction then it is of course still much easier with the South Fork than barehanded. The best method is to cut wedges which the South Fork carves very efficiently. Ideally these are hardwoods or at least harder than the wood being split. If they are too soft they will be compressed by the wood and not be able to split it.

These wedges can be pounded into existing cracks in season or dead woods and crack the rounds apart directly. If the wedges are soft and weak and the wood being split is very hard then it may be necessary to instead to split a piece off of the wood and use this to make a harder and stronger wedge. It may also be necessary to split the wood in sections. If there are no cracks started then the South Fork is ued to cut a notch into the face of the wood to start the wedge. It is usually necessary to reshape the edges during the splitting as the edges often get damaged.

For this type of work in general a simpler steel is prefered to give greater toughness, the Sandvik steels are optimal for a stainless steel in that type of blade.

As a fire starting tool, the South Fork is very useful. In the winter gathering tinder is one of the more difficult parts as most grasses and other light vegetation are scarce in heavy snow. It never hurts to check around though and it only takes a few spots which are blown clear to give enough grass to readily take a flame. Being able to cut the grass/brush rather than tear/break it is useful because often only the very tops are dry and the South Fork will cut through this easily when sharp as will any knife. The sharp edge on the knife is also useful in scraping barks and woods to obtain very thin material which can even be lit from a spark readily from a ferrocium rod.

In the fire started on the right the fire was made just behind a crest of snow which revealed a small space surrounded by walls of snow and heavily enclosed woods. The South Fork cleared aways the necessary vegetation by bending the woods and then slicing through the part under tension and the snow was removed to allow the fire to be started on dry (but frozen) ground. The fire was started by some grasses, birch bark and some dried alders. The surrounding green boughs were used to give a base to the fire to keep the embers from falling on the frozen ground. The surrounding snow gave solid protection from the wind and the fire started easily and in no time at all was burning very strong. The snow walls to the "ice stove" will not put the fire out however massive amounts of steam will be released and the snow doesn't hold or reflect heat. This type of fire can be used for light and as a signal but doesn't work well as a direct source of heat due to all the steam and lack of reflectors. A larger cleared region and a standard wood based fire reflector is much more efficient to provide heat.

Building a fire at night under similar conditions is a lot harder. Without light it is hard to gather materials. Even a few minutes of light enables the tinder to be prepared and once this is done the light from the first stage of the fire is a major help in providing the ability to gather more materials. With the right wood it only takes a short period of time to get a decent blaze. The massive flame on the right it from every green boughs.

Building a fire inside is a lot easier, no wind or rain, and usually there is no end of dry wood available ready to be prepared. The South Fork easily makes a pile of shavings and splits some pine shingles and in no time there is a steady blaze going.

In the winter locally (NL, Canada) it is possible to get weather of enough intensity that due to a combination of high wind (100+ km/hr) and snowfall (more than a foot per day) in just one to two days any non-plowed road/trail is pretty much impassable. There is a trail running up the picture on the right but the snow is above waist deep and it is mainly powder which will not hold even a childs weight. Some times the path can be traversed fairly readily due to ridge lines, dense buildups from previous passes by plows.

The path on the left runs up such a line which can take a mans weight. However moving off of actual roads and into paths in the woods the deep snow has to often be traversed directly. A stout stick is very useful to gauge the dept of the snow as past waist heigh it becomes near impossible to walk, often crawling is possible, snowshoes are usually the best option, easily made with a knife by cutting a bunch of evergreen boughs and lashing them at the top and midway. The South Fork will angle cutting both of these tools, but in general a larger knife with more chopping ability would be of benefit.

Aside from wood, there are more cutting chores in the winter, often snow and ice often need to be cut. Snow blocks can be used to make shelter or to make a more stable fire. If the snow is soft it can be dug out with the hands however if the snow has a top crust it can be so hard that a knife is very useful to cut through it. The South Fork does this readily using the tip to make the initial cut and then sawing to enlarge the cut and break the crust into blocks. The tip has a very slim design due to the distal taper the blocks are cut smaller until they break free, not leveraged loose. Of course a stick can also be cut for prying once the initial cuts are made though generally it won't get through the initial hard crust. The same general technique can be used to dig up or break apart ice. Again as the South Fork has a slim point the knife was not used as a jackhammer with violent stabs driving from the shoulder. The point was used with wrist pops to break apart the ice and the hole gradually enlarged working around the opening and taking advantage of the brittle nature of the ice to allow bigger pieces to be removed. The ice can of course be melted for water, or removed to allow a fire to be started on dry ground, or enable fishing. The ice can be shaped into a lens to allow fire starting by focusing the light from the sun, this is not easy to do.

miscellaneous

The South Fork works readily slices thin plastic, cutting through a television remote case with almost no effort. It also glides effortlessly through cardboard from thin sheet stock to 1/8 and even 1/4" ridged with barely any force. The limits of reading the scale were about half a pound and the South Fork barely registed on the thinner stock. The following table compares the performance to a couple of different knives for reference. All blades were very sharp (beyond shaving) before the cutting, the cuts were made on a slice through twice the blade length so as to check for solid push cutting sharpness in addition to slicing aggression :

Some cardboard cutting with the South Fork, Mora 2000, and Ratweiler
knife 1/8 cardboard 1/4 cardboard
force rank force rank
lbs lbs
South Fork 0.5 10 1.0 10
Mora 2000 5.0 1 7.0 1
Ratweiler 5.0 1 7.0 1

The Mora 2000 is a well regarded single-bevel utility knife which works well as a wood carver, but the nature of the grind is very binding on cardboard, similar to how machetes bind in thick woods, and it is about ten to one behind the South Fork. The Ratweiler is a much thicker small bowie and interestingly enough is near idential to the Mora 2000 on the cardboard, as the Ratweiler's tapered profile due to the high flat grind reduces binding. All these strips of cardboard were tied in bundles and covered with wax to make ready burn logs which allow firestarting in harsh conditions.

In general, the South Fork works well over a wide range of material, the cutting ability is high due to the slim profile from the combination of thin stock, full high flat grind, distal taper and thin and acute edge. It cut styrofoam very thin, almost transparent, went through a used sandal with 5-7 lbs to cut on a draw through the entire blade length, the South Fork was very aggressive on the slice, no slipping along the thick rubber. It slices up plywood with no damage (under 10x magnification). It also was used to split pine with hand force of 9-11 lbs and a rocking motion to start the cut. The birch hardwood splitting was required more force, 44 (2) lbs to make a split, care was taken to prevent twisting of the blade. Some television cable took 31-35 lbs on a trocking press cut.

Edge Retention : main

On cardboard, as a first rough check, the South Fork was compared to a Coyote Meadow and Blackjack small on 1/4" stock with cuts made on a slice through 3 centimeters of blade. The primary edges were cut to 8-12 degrees per side and a final microbevel applied with the fine rods of the Sharpmaker set at 20 degrees per side. The sharpness was measured by cutting light cotton at 200 grams of tension intially and switched to 400 grams during the last two rounds as the blunting was fairly severe.

Slicing edge retention of the South Fork, Coyote Meadow and Blackjack small on 1/4" cardboard with the cutting made on a 3 centimeters draw with the edge set at 8/12 degrees primary and 20 degree Sharpmaker fine rod microbevel. Results given are the edge lengths in centimeters times 100 for ease of comparison needed to cut the cotton.
Knife steel hardness Cardboard
0.0 m 3.1 m 9.3 m 15.8 m
HRC 200 g 400 g
South Fork S30V 60    23 (3) 232 (17) 139 (  9) 206 (11)
Coyote Meadow 10V 62.5 21 (2) 218 (14) 113 (  9) 188 (11)
Blackjack small 52100 NA 29 (3) 200 (12) 207 (12) 329 (16)

Even this rough work, just the average of two runs, was enough to show a large difference between the South Fork, Coyote Meadow and the Blackjack small . The Blackjack was not in the same class as ther other two blades both in initial sharpness and especially in edge retention. To verify the results more cardboard was cut, 1/8" thick, again cuts were made on a slice through three centimeters of blade. This time the final microbevel was set with the medium Sharpmaker rods at 20 degrees, the tension in the cord was 200 grams for all of the cutting for ease of comparison.

Slicing edge retention of the South Fork, Coyote Meadow and Blackjack small on 1/8" cardboard with the cutting made on a 3 centimeters draw with the edge set at 8/12 degrees primary and 20 degree Sharpmaker medium rod microbevel. Results given are the edge lengths in centimeters times 100 for ease of comparison needed to cut the cotton.
Knife Cardboard
0.0 m 3.9 m 10.0 m 21.5 m
200 g
South Fork 25 (2) 110 (  8) 173 (16) 235 (  9)
Coyote Meadow 35 (2) 135 (  9) 198 (10) 225 (10)
Blackjack small 33 (2) 290 (23) 525 (49) 750 (66)

This was an average of four runs with the initial edge set with a 200 grit silicon carbide waterstone and then polished with a 1000 grit alunimum oxide waterstone and then the microbevels applied with the Sharpmaker. With each subsequent round the microbevel bevels were just recut with the Sharpmaker, the primary edge was not recut.

To see if the nature of the abrasive was an influence, specifically if the hardness of the vanadium carbide required a harder sharpening abrasive, another round of cardboard was cut. This time 0.160" thick stock was used and the microbevel applied with a 600 grit DMT 12" rod. Again the tension in the cotton was kept to a uniform 200 grams.

Slicing edge retention of the South Fork, Coyote Meadow and Blackjack small on 0.160" cardboard with the cutting made on a 3 centimeters draw with the edge set at 8/12 degrees primary and 20 degree 600 grit DMT rod microbevel. Results given are the edge lengths in centimeters needed to cut the cotton times 100 for ease of comparison.
Knife Cardboard
0.0 m 1.6 m 4.6 m 17.1 m
200 g
South Fork 35 (2) 60 (3) 140 (  6) 225 (17)
Coyote Meadow 40 (2) 65 (3) 150 (  5) 200 (10)
Blackjack small 43 (3) 78 (4) 325 (20) 588 (41)

The results are similar to the previous run, again the Coyote Meadow is shead of the South Fork, however the blades are very close, and both are massively ahead of the Blackjack small, being able to cut many times more cardboard before the same extent of blunting is noticed. This performance difference is so large little precision is needed to benchmark it, the Blackjack small starts ripping the cardboard towards the end while the other two blades still cut it smoothly. There also seems to be a large difference in how the blades are blunting in that the rate seems to be fairly constant for the 52100 Blackjack by the higher alloy blades from Wilson seem see a reduced rate of blunting towards the end of the cutting. To check this in more detail more work was done and the sharpness checked more frequently.

As as a consistency check on 52100 another 52100 blade was used as a reference, a MEUK which was forged and heat treated by Ed Caffrey to an edge hardness of 57/59 HRC with a softer spine. A Point Guard in 420J2 stainless (54/56 HRC) was used as a low end benchmark. The cardboard used was 1/4" thick, double layered, the edges on the knives were all set to 7/9 degrees per side, a reduced angle to see if any difference was noted as this should enhance the relative performance of the harder blades especially. The edges were honed freehand on a 600 DMT stone, no microbevel, then cleaned with 3 passes per side on leather loaded with chromium/aluminum oxide, then the same on plain leather and finally again on newsprint. The sharpness was measured cutting light cotton under 200 grams of tension as well as slicing and push cutting newsprint.

Slicing edge retention of the South Fork, Coyote Meadow, MEUK and Point Guard on 0.25" cardboard, cutting as through a 3 centimeters draw with the edge set at 7/9 degrees, no microbevel. Results given are the edge lengths in centimeters needed to cut the cotton, times 100 for ease of comparison.
Knife Cardboard
0.0 m 0.6 m 1.8 m 4.1 m 8.8 m 18.1 m
200 g
South Fork 20 (1)   85 (2) 125 (3) 168 (  4) 230 (  8) 283 (  5)
Coyote Meadow 25 (1)   75 (2) 120 (4) 163 (  6) 180 (  4) 220 (  7)
MEUK 20 (1)   98 (4) 163 (5) 238 (13) 465 (18) 900 (54)
Point Guard 30 (1) 140 (4) 275 (8) 450 (24)  

With the reduced edge angle the Coyote Meadow had a pronounced increase in edge retention over the South Fork. The initial sharpness of all blades is much higher than with the 600 DMT rod, which may show the advantage of the flat benchstone over the rod due to lower pressure and resulting minimization of burr formation. Note the massive increase in edge retention over the 1/4" cardboard trial with the microbevel at 20 degrees on the fine Sharpmaker rods. With the edge reduced and the finished left more coarse the two Wilson blades cut six times as much cardboard before having a similar level of blunting being induced.

What is more interesting than the Coyote Meadow having an advantage over the South Fork, which would be expected given it is harder with higher wear resistance, is that the behavior of those blades is radically different than the MEUK and Point Guard which keep blunting at a linear rate while the two Wilson blades fall off in a logarithmic manner. Phil proposed the idea several years ago that this is due to the dependance of long term edge retention being influenced by carbides in those types of steels and the initial loss of edge retention being mainly due to deformation. This seems to be strong evidence for this hypothesis. This is seen more clearly in the following graph :

Image hosting by Photobucket

This also clearly shows that the difference in behavior as the Point Guard and MEUK have a very different responce in extended cutting. Towards the end the Wilson blades are starting to separate and the MEUK and Point Guard are radically outclassed. The behavior is now tending to fall in line with standard ASM ratios for wear resistance which is interesting. At the end of the cutting (note not all blades were stopped at the same point) all blades could still slice newsprint readily and in fact could do rough push cutting if held on an angle if the cut was started. What was interesting is that while the slicing aggression of the MEUK was radically lower than the other two blades, on newsprint it was quite close maybe showing the problems with point measurements of sharpness. However the cotton cutting correlated very well to the cardboard cutting because it correlated quite well to the point at which the MEUK and Point Guard would tear the cardboard (past 4 and 9 meters respectively) :

On plywood, the South Fork showed strong edge retention, resisting edge damage and wear for an extended period of time and could even make very thick cuts without damage. The performance was very different from the small Sebenza also in S30V ground to the same edge angle which shows that how a steel is hardened can significant influence the performance.

Ease of Sharpening : main

Though the grindability of S30V is fairly low which means that it takes longer to remove a given volume of metal, since the edge profile is so narrow and thin on the South Fork very little metal has to be removed because the area of the edge is so small. This minimization of edge greatly enhances ease of sharpening as does the acute initial edge angle which means it would respond rapidly to jigs and v-rods without need for reprofiling.

The South Fork was sharpened on a varity of abrasives to check the cutting ability on 3/8" hemp and see how it ranked on the thread and light cord cutting. A 6" DMT fine benchstone was used, a 1200 grit DMT diafold, 15 micron silicon carbide sandpaper, 0.3 micron aluminum oxide sandpaper, and 0.5 micron chromium/aluminum oxide loaded newspaper. All but the loaded newspaper were used with edge leading sharpening. The final edge angle was 10/12 degrees per side.

sharpening the South Fork with a variety of abrasives.
Abrasive thread cotton hemp
100 g 200 g slice push
grams centimeters (x100) pounds
600 DMT 136 (13)   65 (  6) 32 (3) 7.0 17.5
1200 DMT 118 (19)   67 (  3) 32 (3) 6.5 15.5
15 micron silicon carbide 117 (  7)   80 (  4) 33 (2) 6.5 10.0
0.3 micron alimumum oxide   93 (12) 160 (13) 33 (4) 5.5 11.0
0.5 micron chromium/aluminum oxide   75 (13) 121 (24) 21 (4) 4.5   9.5

The two sandpaper runs are less than optimal as it was difficult to hone into the paper without the edge of the knife cutting through the abrasive. Even though the chromium/aluminum oxide finish has lower edge aggression under low tension on the cotton, it does very well under high tension and slicing the hemp, this is due to the slices essentially becoming push cuts at high forces due to the extreme push cutting sharpness. Those results all use fairly high end and modern abrasives so the question could be asked, can such high alloy steels such as S30V be sharpened well with inexpensive and more traditional abrasives. To investigate this the South Fork was sharpened free hand at 7.7 (2) degrees per side with no microbevel, and left with the finish of the following hones :

sharpening the South Fork with a variety of inexpensive and traditional abrasives .
Abrasive thread cotton hemp
100 g 200 g slice push
grams centimeters (x100) pounds
Coarse aluminum oxide 112 (11)   62 (  5) 29 (2) 7.5 15.5
fine aluminum oxide   90 (  5)   42 (  3) 23 (1) 5.5 12.5
soft white arkansas 100 (  7)   50 (  4) 26 (2) 5.5 12.5
black hard arkansas   89 (  4)   40 (  2) 24 (2) 5.5 11.5
0.5 micron chromium/aluminum oxide   65 (  2) 56 (7) 28 (2) 5.0 10.5

There is no problem achieving a very high level of sharpness, in fact the higher polishes are superior to the first group, this is mainly due to them all being benchstones and not having the difficulty of the tapes. Note the differene in the chromium/aluminum oxide finishes, this is because in the first table it was after the edge produced from the tapes which is less than optimal. Note the hemp results will be elevated in the second table as the edge angle has been reduced by around twenty percent, so as a rough estimate at equal sharpness, this would reduce the force requiried accordingly.

Grip ergonomics / security : main

The handle of the South Fork fits well in the hand in a variety of grips due to the gentle contouring and complete lack of any square edges. Comfort was high even in extended use in very hard cutting with no hot spots of any kind. The index finger cutout worked very well in general, this was one of the more common grips used in a lot of the cutting as the ergonomics were solid in such an overhand grip as the front of the handled flowed well and didn't end in any squarish transitions. The spine is also nicely rounded which also enhanced grip ergonomics in forward and overhand grips.

Though there is no aggressive texture there were no problems with security in general mainly due to the high cutting ability which means little opposing force. Even with the handle lubricated with olive oil there was no problem using it for various utility work and cutting in the kitchen. In order to check the handle security in extremes the grip was lubricated with olive oil and then pressed into a scale and there was no problem putting 40 lbs into the handle without any slippage. Security in the other direction was examined by attaching a 25 lbs lead weight onto the blade and with the handle still lubricated the weight was lifted from the floor. Again there was no slippage :

Sheath : main

This was an evaluation piece, no sheath.

Overview : main

The South Fork combines very high cutting ability, point penetration and grip ergonomics into a very high performance working knife.

Comments and references : main

Comments can be emailed to cliffstamp[REMOVE]@cutleryscience.com or posted to :

More information on the South Fork and other Phil Wilson knives can be seen on the Seamount Knifeworks website.

Most of the pictures in the above are in the PhotoBucket album.


Last updated : 01 : 10 : 2006
Originally written: 01 : 05 : 2006
Up